Bye Brett, Why It Makes Sense for the Packers to Move On

I just can't help myself.

But what do you expect from a guy who grew up blocks from Lambeau Field? I have to add two more cents to the Brett Favre drama.

Favre's place in Packers history likely will be secure in the long run regardless of how this unnecessary soap opera of will he or won't he plays out.

I think Favre is being selfish. The Packers have bent over backward for four seasons (or more, who really knows at this point?) to accommodate his decision-making processes. At some point, wisdom dictates you have to move on, particularly with a 38-year-old quarterback in the NFL.

As Dr. Z wrote on SI.com, many are the aged quarterbacks who failed after going to new teams late in their careers - Namath, Unitas, Montana - to name three.

I can't see Favre enjoying near the level of success he has in Green Bay for three simple reasons:
1. Few, if any, teams have the depth of talent at receiver that Packers have.
2. Few, if any, teams will provide him the comfort level with an offense that he enjoys in Green Bay. There is a reason it took him several years to hit his stride under Coach Mike Holmgren and two under Coach Mike McCarthy. It takes time to adjust to new offenses no matter who you are (more on this later).
3. Anything short of a Super Bowl in a new city would be considered a failure, and if Favre thinks he is under the microscope in Green Bay, try New York, Carolina, Washington, Chicago or Minnesota, where teams believe they are one Brett Favre away from w inning it all. This would be incredible pressure.

So what is the Packers' problem with him changing his mind?

Two things.

First, McCarthy tailored the Packers' offense to suit Favre's strengths, which are many. Few can match his arm strength and experience. However, his mobility has declined dramatically in the past 4-5 seasons, and his decision-making often leaves much to be desired. But that's part of the package and most Packers fans gladly have lived with the picks as well as the wins. ... When Favre retired, changed his mind, then unchanged his mind in the spring, the Packers had to move forward from a strategy standpoint. That means making the offense more friendly to a younger, more accurate, more mobile but less experienced quarterback, Aaron Rodgers. The Packers spent all of their mini-camps and OTAs implementing changes to enhance Rodgers' skills and mask his deficiencies. Changing everything back is not as easy as it might seem in this era of increasingly complex NFL offenses.

Second, what sort of message does this send the team? That Favre can do whatever he wants? Coach Mike Sherman allowed that, and the result was one of the club's worst seasons ever in 2005. And what sort of message does it send to Aaron Rodgers, who has endured the will he or won't he talk for four years? Rodgers is the present and the future for the Packers under center. To jeopardize that to placate the indecisive Favre and his "fans" is simply stupid from a football standpoint. The Packers must find out what they have in Rodgers. After all, they've invested four seasons in him at this point, and if he leaves after next season and lights it up for another team, it will rank as a bigger waste than paying Brett Favre another $12 million to sit on the bench.

Brett Favre is one of my all-time favorite football players, and that won't change with this episode. I own his jerseys. I own his football cards. However, his selfish or at the least confused attitude has left a bad taste in my mouth.